There is strong, no compelling evidence that points to Larry Swearingen's innocence, some of which ignored by the courts from the get-go. Most significant is a false presumption of correctness by a now discredited medical examiner who concluded a post mortem interval of 25 days -- convenient for the prosecutor. Both entomological and medical findings refute this presumption,as well as the aggravate rape charge; the prosecutor did not take any material for slides, and the picture she took to document rape were refuted by three independent forensic pathologists.
I have been on this case for close to four years , and am convinced of Swearingen's absolute innocence. If Texas executes Swearingen, it would be cold blooded malicious premeditated murder (of someone who is demonstrably innocent). More details on demand.
G M Larkin MD DABFM FACFE
Forensic Pathologist
No comments:
Post a Comment